<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Interstate Renewable Energy Council &#187; Connecting to the Grid Newsletter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://irecusa.org/category/newsletters/connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://irecusa.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:30:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>March 2010 Connecting to the Grid Newsletter</title>
		<link>http://irecusa.org/2010/03/march-2010-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/</link>
		<comments>http://irecusa.org/2010/03/march-2010-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LaurelV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Connecting to the Grid Newsletter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irecusa.org/?p=12624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WHAT&#8217;S NEW AS OF MARCH 2010?
Note from the Editor: Investor-Owned Utilities: Going Solar and Staying Profitable
Last month I posted an article about some of the constraints that electric cooperatives face when considering more renewable-friendly policies.  Investor-owned utilities (IOUs) confront a somewhat different array of challenges because they are generally privately owned and state-regulated.  According to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>WHAT&#8217;S NEW AS OF MARCH 2010?</h2>
<h3>Note from the Editor: Investor-Owned Utilities: Going Solar and Staying Profitable</h3>
<p>Last month I posted an article about some of the constraints that electric cooperatives face when considering more renewable-friendly policies.  Investor-owned utilities (IOUs) confront a somewhat different array of challenges because they are generally privately owned and state-regulated.  According to EIA data, IOUs account for 6% of all utilities, 42% of generation, 66% of sales and 67% of revenue in the United States, ultimately serving about 100 million customers. </p>
<p>Like most private ventures, these utilities are profit-motivated, either distributing dividends to shareholders or reinvesting profits in their company. This for-profit structure has traditionally precluded many voluntary renewable energy incentives but, as state Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) benchmarks are coming due, utilities are starting to find more innovative ways to purchase or otherwise support green power. As of this month, 29 states plus D.C. have an RPS that requires utilities and/or electricity suppliers to invest in renewable energy or buy renewable energy credits (RECs) to account for a certain percentage of their retail electricity sales.  Faced with these and other regulatory requirements, as well as the promise of possible profits, utilities must now decide if and how they will participate in the renewable energy industry. The situation is further complicated by electricity restructuring laws which may prohibit an electric distribution utility from owning generation assets, in which case the utility may have to consider other options.  <em>[Continued in Newsletter]</em></p>
<h3>State News in Detail</h3>
<h4>Northeast States</h4>
<p>Connecticut DPUC issues favorable draft decision on meter aggregation; town and utility reach agreement</p>
<p>New York removes peak load limitation for net metering</p>
<p>Maine PUC adopts rules for community-based pilot program</p>
<h4>Mid-Atlantic States</h4>
<p>Delaware finalizes net metering changes, allowing grid-integrated vehicles to net-meter</p>
<p>D.C. PSC releases proposed rules for net metering          </p>
<h4>Midwestern States</h4>
<p>Illinois ICC adopts interconnection standards for large distributed generation facilities</p>
<h4>Southern States</h4>
<p>Louisiana PSC issues strawman RPS proposal</p>
<p>Mississippi net metering bill dies in committee</p>
<h4>Western States</h4>
<p>California increases aggregate participation cap</p>
<p>Montana PSC issues proposed interconnection standards for systems up to 10MW</p>
<p>Oregon PUC considers an array of Feed-in Tariff proposals</p>
<h4>Other States</h4>
<p>Hawaii PUC reaches decision on rate decoupling, increasing RPS Goal</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<h3>Miscellaneous News and Events</h3>
<p>NC report supportive of solar and wind increases</p>
<p>CPUC rejects fuel cell proposal</p>
<p>FERC seeks comments on integration of renewables</p>
<h2>Download the full newsletter as a PDF:  <a href="http://irecusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/March-2010-Connecting-to-the-Grid1.pdf">March 2010 Connecting to the Grid</a></h2>
<h3>FORMAT</h3>
<p>While customer-sited net metering and interconnection policies are primarily addressed at the state level, they are also becoming important on a regional basis. This newsletter has been designed to provide state-level policy updates and capture emerging regional trends.<strong> </strong>Connecting to the Grid is a free, electronic newsletter published each month by the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) and the North Carolina Solar Center at North Carolina State University. <a title="subscribe to IREC's Connecting to the Grid Newsletter" href="http://visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101486440047" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101486440047&amp;referer=');">Click here</a> to subscribe.</p>
<p>Editor: <em><a title="Laurel Varnado email" href="mailto:lavarnad@ncsu.edu" target="_blank">Laurel Varnado</a></em><br />
NC Solar Center, NC State University</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irecusa.org/2010/03/march-2010-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>February 2010 Connecting to the Grid Newsletter</title>
		<link>http://irecusa.org/2010/02/february-2010-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/</link>
		<comments>http://irecusa.org/2010/02/february-2010-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LaurelV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Connecting to the Grid News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecting to the Grid Newsletter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irecusa.org/?p=12159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WHAT&#8217;S NEW AS OF FEBRUARY 2010?
Note from the Editor: Innovative Utility Practices, a Focus on Co-ops 
Our centralized-generation model of energy infrastructure was clearly a driving force behind the acceleration of American economic development in the 20th century.  Considering the current media and political buzz around transitioning to a clean energy economy, the U.S. is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><span style="color: #000000;">WHAT&#8217;S NEW AS OF FEBRUARY 2010?</span></h2>
<h3><span style="color: #000000;">Note from the Editor: </span><span style="color: #000000;">Innovative Utility Practices, a Focus on Co-ops </span></h3>
<p>Our centralized-generation model of energy infrastructure was clearly a driving force behind the acceleration of American economic development in the 20th century.  Considering the current media and political buzz around transitioning to a clean energy economy, the U.S. is in the midst of rethinking this model.  Many forward-thinking utilities have already begun to transform their business-as-usual approach to fit the next-generation of power delivery needs.</p>
<p>The three main types of utilities, investor-owned, municipal and cooperative, are similar in many respects but their fundamental structure and purpose differs enough to cause variations in their approach to net metering and interconnection policies. Despite the inherent constraints of each utility type, some utilities have heeded the call for more and cheaper options to connect renewable energy to the grid.  This month we begin to look at some of the constraints that bind utilities’ policy-making abilities and ways that utilities are working with the system to ramp up renewables.  I’ll start the discussion with electric cooperatives and in subsequent months we will be following up with a look at municipal and investor-owned utilities. <em>[Continued in Newsletter]</em></p>
<h3><span style="color: #000000;"> </span></h3>
<h3><span style="color: #000000;">State News in Detail</span></h3>
<h3><span style="color: #000000;"> </span></h3>
<h4><span style="color: #000000;">Northeast States</span></h4>
<p>Connecticut to Hold Hearing on Network Interconnections</p>
<p>Con Edison Calls for More Solar Projects; PSC Approves Net Metering Tariffs</p>
<p>Rhode Island Releases State-Wide Energy Plan</p>
<p>Vermont PSB issues FIT order</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<h4>Mid-Atlantic States</h4>
<p>New Jersey Removes 2 MW Cap on Net Metering</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<h4>Midwestern States</h4>
<p>Michigan PSC Announces a Sharp Increase in Net Metering Participants</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<h4>Southern States</h4>
<p>Florida’s FKEC Initiates Solar Community Lease Program</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<h4>Western States</h4>
<p>California PUC Proposes Alternate Decision Approving PV DG Program; SMUD opens and closes FIT queue</p>
<p>Fort Collins, Colorado Adopts Formal Net Metering Provision into City Code</p>
<p>Utah PSC Issues Proposed Rules for Interconnection; RMP responds with proposed agreements</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<h4>Other States</h4>
<p>Alaska RCA Finalizes Net Metering Rules</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<h3><span style="color: #000000;">Miscellaneous News and Events</span></h3>
<p>NREL Releases FIT Report</p>
<p>President’s Office Requests Info on Smart Grid Interface</p>
<p>San Francisco Adopts PACE Financing Model</p>
<h2>Download the full newsletter as a PDF: <a href="http://irecusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/February-2010-Connecting-to-the-Grid.pdf">February 2010 Connecting to the Grid</a></h2>
<h3><span style="color: #000000;"> </span></h3>
<h3><span style="color: #000000;">FORMAT</span></h3>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">While customer-sited net metering and interconnection policies are primarily addressed at the state level, they are also becoming important on a regional basis. This newsletter has been designed to provide state-level policy updates and capture emerging regional trends.<strong> </strong>Connecting to the Grid is a free, electronic newsletter published each month by the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) and the North Carolina Solar Center at North Carolina State University. </span><a title="subscribe to IREC's Connecting to the Grid Newsletter" href="http://visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101486440047" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101486440047&amp;referer=');"><span style="color: #0000ff;">Click here</span></a><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="color: #0000ff;"> </span>to subscribe.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Editor: <em><a title="Laurel Varnado email" href="mailto:lavarnad@ncsu.edu" target="_blank">Laurel Varnado</a></em><br />
NC Solar Center, NC State University</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: xx-small;"> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irecusa.org/2010/02/february-2010-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>January 2010 Connecting to the Grid Newsletter</title>
		<link>http://irecusa.org/2010/01/january-10-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/</link>
		<comments>http://irecusa.org/2010/01/january-10-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LaurelV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Connecting to the Grid Newsletter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irecusa.org/?p=11489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor: Laurel Varnado
NC Solar Center, NC State University
HOW TO SUBSCRIBE
The Connecting to the Grid newsletter is published electronically every month by the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) and the North Carolina Solar Center at North Carolina State University. This is a free publication. Click here to subscribe.
FORMAT
While customer-sited net metering and interconnection are primarily state [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Editor: <em><a title="Laurel Varnado email" href="mailto:lavarnad@ncsu.edu" target="_blank">Laurel Varnado</a></em><br />
NC Solar Center, NC State University</p>
<h4>HOW TO SUBSCRIBE</h4>
<p>The Connecting to the Grid newsletter is published electronically every month by the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) and the North Carolina Solar Center at North Carolina State University. This is a free publication. <a title="subscribe to IREC's Connecting to the Grid Newsletter" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101486440047&amp;referer=');pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101486440047&amp;referer=http%3A%2F%2Firecusa.org%2Fcategory%2Fnewsletters%2Fconnecting-to-the-grid-newsletter%2F');" href="http://visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101486440047" target="_blank">Click here</a> to subscribe.</p>
<h3>FORMAT</h3>
<p>While customer-sited net metering and interconnection are primarily state issues, they are also becoming important on a regional basis. This newsletter has been designed to capture any subtle, emerging regional trends. The state news is presented in geographic categories, primarily because the standard NERC and/or RTO/ISO regions do not always align with state boundaries. Please direct comments and questions about the newsletter to <a title="Laurel Varnado email" href="mailto:lavarnad@ncsu.edu" target="_blank">Laurel Varnado</a>.</p>
<p><strong> <a href="http://irecusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/January_2010_Connecting_to_the_Grid.pdf">January 2010 Connecting to the Grid Newsletter (PDF)</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://irecusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/January_2010_Connecting_to_the_Grid.doc">January 2010 Connecting to the Grid Newsletter (MS Word)</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>WHAT’S NEW AS OF JANUARY 2010</strong></p>
<p><strong>Note from the Editor: Celebrating the Year’s and Decade’s Achievements</strong></p>
<p>The New Year always provides good opportunity for reflection, so in keeping with “Best of” traditions, I thought I would highlight the major achievements that we witnessed in 2009 for Net Metering and Interconnection-related policies.</p>
<ol>
<li>Several states improved upon their interconnection procedures, increasing the system cap to 10 MW or greater, including D.C, South Dakota, Virginia and Oregon.</li>
<li>After a brief legal battle, Missouri relaxed its insurance requirements for interconnecting DG systems.</li>
<li>We saw a surprising number of states that enacted or adopted policies for the first time, including Kentucky, Nebraska, Alaska, Kansas, and South Carolina</li>
<li>Several states formalized rules for shared system net metering including Maine, Vermont and Massachusetts. Rhode Island also passed legislation allowing virtual net metering for up to 10 accounts owned by government and certain other classes of utility customers.</li>
<li>Aggregate participation caps also got a boost in several states: New Hampshire (saw a small increase to 1%), Delaware (5%), Utah (for Rocky Mountain Power: 20%), and North Carolina (removed the cap altogether)</li>
<li>Delaware and California allowed indefinite rollover of net metering credits.</li>
<li>Michigan, North Carolina and West Virginia are working on REC tracking platforms</li>
<li>Several states are working on fixed price offerings or feed-in tariffs (FITs) including Hawaii, California, Oregon, Maine and Wisconsin</li>
</ol>
<p>But wait, let’s not stop there! Not only was it the turn of a new year but it was also the turn of a new decade.  Recently, I came across a net metering map that had been created by the folks at DSIRE, of course, showing states with net metering policies in the year 2000.  Only 22 states were shaded.  If you compare that to today’s DSIRE map you will see a remarkable difference; almost twice as many states have net metering now than did ten years ago.<em> [Continued in Newsletter]</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<h3><span style="color: #000000;">State News in Detail:</span></h3>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Northeast States<span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></strong></p>
<p>Connecticut utilities issue report on interconnection to networks</p>
<p>New York PSC expands RPS to 30%</p>
<p>Maine PUC adopts best-practices interconnection procedures</p>
<p>Massachusetts launches comprehensive solar program</p>
<p>Vermont PSB staff issue proposal for setting renewable energy FIT prices</p>
<p><strong>Mid-Atlantic States</strong></p>
<p>Maryland Governor accepts proposal to increase incentives for renewable energy in the state</p>
<p>New Jersey separates NM and IC rules, lifting 2MW cap on interconnection; proposes lifting 2MW cap on net metering.</p>
<p>Pennsylvania PUC issues policy statement in support of solar projects</p>
<p><strong>Midwestern States </strong></p>
<p>Kansas public utility voluntarily adopts net metering, interconnection</p>
<p>Missouri PSC sends Renewable Energy Standard proposal to Secretary of State for approval</p>
<p>Wisconsin PSC notes that all utilities are meeting or exceeding RPS goals</p>
<p><strong>Southern States</strong></p>
<p>North Carolina’s Duke Energy begins second phase of Solar Distributed Generation Program</p>
<p><strong>Western States</strong></p>
<p>Arizona ACC rules on third-party arrangement for school districts</p>
<p>CPUC provides standard contract for CHP generation delivered to the grid</p>
<p>New Mexico PRC upholds ruling on third-party sales</p>
<p>Oregon PUC posts FIT workshop information</p>
<p>Washington UTC files NOPR on smart grid work</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Miscellaneous News </strong></p>
<p>China Increases Renewable Energy Goal</p>
<p>California to allow tradable RECs to meet RPS compliance</p>
<p>A Round-up of Feed-in Tariff news from Around the World</p>
<p><strong>Conferences and Events</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irecusa.org/2010/01/january-10-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>December 09 Connecting to the Grid Newsletter</title>
		<link>http://irecusa.org/2009/12/10115/</link>
		<comments>http://irecusa.org/2009/12/10115/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LaurelV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Connecting to the Grid Newsletter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irecusa.org/?p=10115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor: Laurel Varnado
NC Solar Center, NC State University
HOW TO SUBSCRIBE
The Connecting to the Grid newsletter is published electronically every month by the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) and the North Carolina Solar Center at North Carolina State University. This is a free publication. Click here to subscribe.
FORMAT
While customer-sited net metering and interconnection are primarily state [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Editor: <em><a title="Laurel Varnado email" href="mailto:lavarnad@ncsu.edu" target="_blank">Laurel Varnado</a></em><br />
NC Solar Center, NC State University</p>
<h4>HOW TO SUBSCRIBE</h4>
<p>The Connecting to the Grid newsletter is published electronically every month by the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) and the North Carolina Solar Center at North Carolina State University. This is a free publication. <a title="subscribe to IREC's Connecting to the Grid Newsletter" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101486440047&amp;referer=');pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101486440047&amp;referer=http%3A%2F%2Firecusa.org%2Fcategory%2Fnewsletters%2Fconnecting-to-the-grid-newsletter%2F');" href="http://visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101486440047" target="_blank">Click here</a> to subscribe.</p>
<h3>FORMAT</h3>
<p>While customer-sited net metering and interconnection are primarily state issues, they are also becoming important on a regional basis. This newsletter has been designed to capture any subtle, emerging regional trends. The state news is presented in geographic categories, primarily because the standard NERC and/or RTO/ISO regions do not always align with state boundaries. Please direct comments and questions about the newsletter to <a title="Laurel Varnado email" href="mailto:lavarnad@ncsu.edu" target="_blank">Laurel Varnado</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://irecusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/December_2009_Connecting_to_the_Grid.doc" target="_blank">December_2009_Connecting_to_the_Grid</a></p>
<h4>WHAT’S NEW AS OF DECEMBER 2009?</h4>
<p><strong>Note from the Editor: The 2009 annual report cards are in!</strong></p>
<p>They’ve tallied the scores and the grades are in. Last month the Network for New Energy Choices (NNEC) released <a href="http://www.newenergychoices.org/uploads/FreeingTheGrid2009.pdf" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.newenergychoices.org/uploads/FreeingTheGrid2009.pdf?referer=');">Freeing the Grid 2009</a>, an annual report on state net metering and interconnection policies, which it has been publishing since 2007.  It is remarkable to note the progress that states have made in such a short time span since the first edition was published. The sidebar below shows this progression by comparing the number of states that fell into each grade category in 2009 as compared with 2007.</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<p align="center">
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As progressive states, like the 2009 best practices feature state of Oregon, improve their policies, they continually raise the bar for everyone else. In order to capture these trends NNEC works to fine-tune the scoring methodology. It is possible that some states might have moved up or down a grade even though they didn’t change their policy.  The pertinent change was a new category that awards points for the allowance of power purchase agreements (PPAs) in state net metering policies. At the end of FTG ’09 (beginning on pg. 95) there is a great synopsis of the bolstering effect that PPAs have on solar markets in states where they are allowed to operate. [<em>Continued in Newsletter</em>]</p>
<p><strong>State News in Detail:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Northeast States</strong><br />
Maine PUC rules on solar company’s petition to be classified as a distribution utility<br />
Massachusetts net metering tariffs in effect<br />
New York authorizes PACE financing model for renewable energy investments<br />
<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Mid-Atlantic States</strong><br />
D.C. OPC Comments clarify net metering NOPR<br />
New Jersey BPU answers questions and extends deadline for Renewable Energy Grid Connected Program<br />
West Virginia enacts bill to establish REC tracking</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Midwestern States<br />
</strong>Missouri-based utility announces plans for solar projects, rebates for customers<br />
Kansas to host Midwest electricity law seminar<br />
Kentucky and TVA sign clean energy pact<br />
Ohio PUC places net metering tariffs into effect<br />
Wisconsin’s Advanced Renewables Tariff discussion recap</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Southern States</strong><br />
Florida PSC notes that renewable energy and residential interconnections are on the rise<br />
Georgia PSC approves “solar only” modification to Georgia Power’s green energy tariff</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Western States</strong><br />
Arizona’s SRP announces installation of 14 solar PV systems at area schools<br />
California’s PG&amp;E increases net metering cap; CPUC approves space-based solar PPA<br />
Montana Municipal utility fined for lack of RPS compliance<br />
Nevada PUC issues draft rules for net metering in conjunction with incentives</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Miscellaneous News<br />
</strong>NREL State of the States Report Released<br />
DOE Launches New Website to Bring Energy Technology Information to the Public<br />
Neighborhood Batteries Coming to Ohio, Detroit<br />
Solar Company Sells Solar Panels at Big-Box Retail Stores</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Conferences and Events</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irecusa.org/2009/12/10115/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>November 09 Connecting to the Grid Newsletter</title>
		<link>http://irecusa.org/2009/11/november-09-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/</link>
		<comments>http://irecusa.org/2009/11/november-09-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JaneP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Connecting to the Grid Newsletter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irecusa.org/?p=8814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor:  Laurel Varnado
NC Solar Center, NC State University
HOW TO SUBSCRIBE
The Connecting to the Grid newsletter is published electronically every month by the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) and the North Carolina Solar Center at North Carolina State University.  This is a free publication.  Click here to subscribe.
FORMAT
While customer-sited net metering and interconnection [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Editor: <em> <a title="Laurel Varnado email" href="mailto:lavarnad@ncsu.edu" target="_blank">Laurel Varnado</a></em><br />
NC Solar Center, NC State University</p>
<h4>HOW TO SUBSCRIBE</h4>
<p>The Connecting to the Grid newsletter is published electronically every month by the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) and the North Carolina Solar Center at North Carolina State University.  This is a free publication.  <a title="subscribe to IREC's Connecting to the Grid Newsletter" href="http://visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101486440047" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101486440047&amp;referer=');">Click here</a> to subscribe.</p>
<h3>FORMAT</h3>
<p>While customer-sited net metering and interconnection are primarily state issues, they are also becoming important on a regional basis.    This newsletter has been designed to capture any subtle, emerging regional trends.  The state news is presented in geographic categories, primarily because the standard NERC and/or RTO/ISO regions do not always align with state boundaries. Please direct comments and questions about the newsletter to <a title="Laurel Varnado email" href="mailto:lavarnad@ncsu.edu" target="_blank">Laurel Varnado</a>.</p>
<h4><em><a href="http://irecusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/November_2009_Connecting_to_the_Grid.pdf">November_2009_Connecting_to_the_Grid (pdf)<br />
</a></em></h4>
<h4><em><a href="http://irecusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/November_2009_Connecting_to_the_Grid1.doc">November 2009 Connecting to the Grid (Word file)</a></em></h4>
<p><em><br />
</em></p>
<h4>WHAT&#8217;S NEW AS OF NOVEMBER 2009?</h4>
<p>Supermodels of Renewable Energy Policy</p>
<p>As President Barack Obama declared October <a title="National Energy Awareness Month" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Presidential-Proclamation-National-Energy-Awareness-Month/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Presidential-Proclamation-National-Energy-Awareness-Month/?referer=');">National Energy Awareness Month</a>, I thought it was fitting that IREC released several useful documents last month.  These reports should be of special interest to the readers of Connecting to the Grid because all of them touch upon net metering and interconnection and include: <a href="http://irecusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Connecting-to-the-Grid-Guide-6th-edition.pdf">Connecting to the Grid Guide 6th edition</a>, <a rel="attachment wp-att-8819" href="http://irecusa.org/2009/11/november-09-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/irec_nm_model_october_2009-1-5-3/">Net Metering</a> and <a rel="attachment wp-att-8818" href="http://irecusa.org/2009/11/november-09-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/irec-ic-model-final-nov-8-2009-3/">Interconnection Model Procedures</a>, and the <a rel="attachment wp-att-8820" href="http://irecusa.org/2009/11/november-09-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/irec-2009-annual-reportfinal/">2009 Updates and Trends Report</a>.</p>
<p>As many of you are aware, IREC strives to promote best practices in renewable energy policy. The net metering and interconnection models provide a detailed picture of what IREC considers best practices in these arenas.  They provide a useful means for anyone interested in learning more about these tools, including policy makers, regulators, utilities, industry representatives and the general public. The following is a summary of some of the main provisions in each of the models:</p>
<h4>Net metering</h4>
<ul>
<li>No hard cap on system size, instead systems are limited to the service entrance capacity</li>
<li>Indefinite rollover of net metering credits (this helps to prevent over-sizing of systems)</li>
<li>No aggregate limit on participation in net metering programs</li>
<li>No explicit prohibition of 3rd party ownership of net metered systems</li>
<li>Customer retains Renewable Energy Credits associated with production.</li>
<li>The aggregation of multiple meters is allowed on a customer-generator’s property or contiguous properties (i.e. one system may off-set multiple meters, regardless of rate schedule).</li>
</ul>
<p><em>[Continued in the Newsletter]</em></p>
<h4>State News in Detail</h4>
<p><em>Northeast States</em></p>
<p>&#8211;Maine PUC issues proposed rules for the Community-Based Renewable Energy Pilot Program</p>
<p>&#8211;Massachusetts DPU announced deployment of 5 MW of utility solar installations</p>
<p>&#8211;New York DPS seeks to evaluate the permitting process for interconnecting generators</p>
<p><em>Mid-Atlantic States</em></p>
<p>&#8211;D.C. PSC issues Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for net metering regulations</p>
<p>&#8211;Maryland PSC will hold rule-making session on the state&amp;rsquo;s RPS modifications</p>
<p>&#8211;New Jersey BPU issues solicitation for grid-connected wind and biomass projects</p>
<p><em>Midwestern States</em></p>
<p>&#8211;Michigan PSC launches renewable energy tracking system</p>
<p>&#8211;Missouri PSC closes net metering docket</p>
<p>&#8211;Wisconsin PSC holds technical conference on Advanced Renewables Tariff</p>
<p><em>Southern States</em></p>
<p>&#8211;North Carolina Commission issues RFP for the development of a REC tracking system</p>
<p>&#8211;South Carolina utilities file net metering tariffs with the PSC</p>
<p><em>Western States</em></p>
<p>&#8211;California PUC releases report on CSI program</p>
<p>&#8211;Colorado re-issues interconnection rules</p>
<p>&#8211;Nevada PUC opens an investigation of Feed-in Tariffs</p>
<p>&#8211;Oregon PUC issues draft rule for pilot solar feed-in tariff</p>
<p><em>Other States</em></p>
<p>&#8211;Alaska RCA approves net metering modifications</p>
<p>&#8211;Hawaii Governor links with China for renewable energy partnership</p>
<p><em>Miscellaneous News</em></p>
<p>&#8211;Solar Advocates Applaud PG&amp;E Commitment to Expand Net Metering Program in California</p>
<p>&#8211;DOE and NREL Announce Open PV Mapping Project</p>
<p>&#8211;Super Hub Planned to Move Renewable Energy</p>
<p><em>Conferences and Events</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irecusa.org/2009/11/november-09-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>October 2009 IREC &quot;Connecting to the Grid&quot; Newsletter</title>
		<link>http://irecusa.org/2009/10/october-2009-irec-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/</link>
		<comments>http://irecusa.org/2009/10/october-2009-irec-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Connecting to the Grid Newsletter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irecusa.org/2009/10/october-2009-irec-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor:  Laurel Varnado
NC Solar Center, NC State University
HOW TO SUBSCRIBE
The Connecting to the Grid newsletter is published electronically every month by the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) and the North Carolina Solar Center at North Carolina State University.  This is a free publication.  Click here to subscribe.
FORMAT 
While customer-sited net metering and interconnection are primarily [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Editor:  Laurel Varnado</p>
<p>NC Solar Center, NC State University</p>
<p><strong>HOW TO SUBSCRIBE</strong></p>
<p>The Connecting to the Grid newsletter is published electronically every month by the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) and the North Carolina Solar Center at North Carolina State University.  This is a free publication.  Click <a href="http://visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101486440047" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101486440047&amp;referer=');">here</a> to subscribe.</p>
<p><strong>FORMAT </strong></p>
<p>While customer-sited net metering and interconnection are primarily state issues, they are also becoming important on a regional basis.    This newsletter has been designed to capture any subtle, emerging regional trends.  The state news is presented in geographic categories, primarily because the standard NERC and/or RTO/ISO regions do not always align with state boundaries. Please direct comments and questions about the newsletter to Laurel Varnado at <a href="mailto:lavarnad@ncsu.edu">lavarnad@ncsu.edu</a>.</p>
<p><strong><em>Note:  Scroll to the bottom of this page to download complete newsletter</em></strong>.</p>
<p><strong>WHAT&#8217;S NEW AS OF OCTOBER 2009? </strong></p>
<p>Readers, we’d like to hear from you!</p>
<p>First, please take a moment to fill out a quick <a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=09FSxGJX4r_2fngIPxHLrA8A_3d_3d" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=09FSxGJX4r_2fngIPxHLrA8A_3d_3d&amp;referer=');">six-question survey</a> about how we can make the <em>Connecting to the Grid</em> newsletter a more useful tool for you.</p>
<p>Secondly, I would like to incorporate an interactive component to the newsletter. I know that <em>Connecting to the Grid</em> readers have a wealth of information and questions and I’d like to create a forum to discuss them.  Please send any questions or comments to me at <a href="mailto:lavarnad@ncsu.edu">lavarnad@ncsu.edu</a>; I will choose a handful and include them in future newsletters with a response. Please indicate if you would like your name or contact information included with your submission. I will certainly do my best to find answers for your questions and I believe this will help increase dialogue within the interconnection/net metering community.</p>
<p><strong>Note from the Editor &#8211; Interconnection Policies, by the Numbers</strong></p>
<p>Last month we looked at a general overview of net metering and I thought it only fair to give interconnection policies their share of the spotlight this month.  Let’s begin with some numbers:</p>
<ul>
<li> Three states adopted a standard for the first time in 2009.</li>
<li> Eleven states have enacted or adopted revisions in their interconnection policies in 2009.</li>
<li> Thirteen states allow interconnections to networks.</li>
<li> Twenty states plus D.C. have 3 or more technical screens process applications.</li>
<li> Forty-one states have an interconnection standard, guidelines or working draft rules in place.</li>
</ul>
<p><em> [Continued in Newsletter]</em></p>
<p><strong>State News in Detail</strong></p>
<p><strong>Northeast States </strong></p>
<p>Maine PUC deliberating over community renewable energy act</p>
<p>Massachusetts DPU to hold public hearing on utilities’ proposed NM/IC tariffs</p>
<p>NY DPS will hold technical conference on the state’s RPS program; Governor announces release of funding for solar projects</p>
<p>Vermont PSB issues order setting interim standard offer prices for renewable energy</p>
<p><strong>Mid-Atlantic States</strong></p>
<p>New Jersey BPU announces solicitation results from solar financing program</p>
<p><strong>Midwestern States </strong></p>
<p>Indiana report released detailing renewable energy potential in the state</p>
<p>Iowa IUB uses Illinois’ interconnection standards as a starting point for IC rulemaking</p>
<p>Kansas KCC seeking clarity on net metering/interconnection rulemaking</p>
<p>Michigan PSC seeking comments on interconnection proposal</p>
<p>Nebraska PPD receives renewable energy proposals</p>
<p>Wisconsin PSC continues work on the Advanced Renewables Tariff</p>
<p><strong>Southern States </strong></p>
<p>New Orleans City Council raises system size caps for commercial facilities</p>
<p>Tennessee’s Volunteer State Solar Initiative approved by DOE</p>
<p><strong>Western States </strong></p>
<p>Arizona’s ACC allows SolarCity to enter into PPA with school district</p>
<p>California governor signs net metering, feed-in tariff laws</p>
<p>Idaho’s RMP seeks discount on avoided cost payment to wind generators</p>
<p>Oregon PUC approves interconnection forms and agreements for systems up to 10 MW</p>
<p>Utah PSC working on rulemaking for interconnection up to 20 MW</p>
<p><strong>Other States</strong></p>
<p>Hawaii PUC finalizes feed-in tariff decision</p>
<p><strong>Miscellaneous News </strong></p>
<p>New Jersey Leads Nation in Solar Energy per Square Mile</p>
<p>Toward better solar cells: Chemists gain control of light-harvesting paths</p>
<p>Gov. Schwarzenegger and Secretary Salazar Sign MOU</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Conferences and Events</strong></p>
<hr />
<dl>
<dt>Files:</dt>
<dd><a href="http://irecusa.org/uploads/media/October_2009_Connecting_to_the_Grid.doc">October_2009_Connecting_to_the_Grid.doc</a></dd>
</dl>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irecusa.org/2009/10/october-2009-irec-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>September 2009 IREC &quot;Connecting to the Grid&quot; Newsletter</title>
		<link>http://irecusa.org/2009/09/september-2009-irec-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/</link>
		<comments>http://irecusa.org/2009/09/september-2009-irec-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Connecting to the Grid Newsletter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irecusa.org/2009/09/september-2009-irec-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor:  Laurel Varnado
NC Solar Center, NC State University
HOW TO SUBSCRIBE
The Connecting to the Grid newsletter is published electronically every month by the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) and the North Carolina Solar Center at North Carolina State University.  This is a free publication.  Click here to subscribe.
FORMAT 
While customer-sited net metering and interconnection are primarily [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Editor:  Laurel Varnado</p>
<p>NC Solar Center, NC State University</p>
<p><strong>HOW TO SUBSCRIBE</strong></p>
<p>The Connecting to the Grid newsletter is published electronically every month by the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) and the North Carolina Solar Center at North Carolina State University.  This is a free publication.  Click <a href="http://visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101486440047" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101486440047&amp;referer=');">here</a> to subscribe.</p>
<p><strong>FORMAT </strong></p>
<p>While customer-sited net metering and interconnection are primarily state issues, they are also becoming important on a regional basis.    This newsletter has been designed to capture any subtle, emerging regional trends.  The state news is presented in geographic categories, primarily because the standard NERC and/or RTO/ISO regions do not always align with state boundaries. Please direct comments and questions about the newsletter to Laurel Varnado at <a href="mailto:lavarnad@ncsu.edu">lavarnad@ncsu.edu</a>.</p>
<p><strong><em>Note:  Scroll to the bottom of this page to download complete newsletter</em></strong>.</p>
<p><strong>WHAT&#8217;S NEW AS OF SEPTEMBER 2009? </strong></p>
<p><strong>Note from the Editor &#8211; <strong>Zooming out for a broader perspective of net metering</strong></strong></p>
<p>For the last few months we have delved into some specific net metering issues such as Renewable Energy Credit (REC) ownership, third-party arrangements and net excess rollover.  While it is important to explore the finer points of such issues, it can also be useful to widen our scope and see how they’re currently addressed in the patchwork of state net metering policies. This month, I looked at some of the main issues surrounding net metering, tallied the number of states that fit into various categories and offer the following insights.  These graphics are based on data from the infinitely-useful <em>Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency</em> (<a href="http://www.dsireusa.org/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dsireusa.org/?referer=');">www.dsireusa.org</a>) on the 42 state-wide net metering policies (plus the District of Columbia). Voluntary utility policies were not included.</p>
<p>For the first graph, I looked at the number of states that allowed various renewable technology types to net meter. All of the states included PV and wind systems, and most included hydro, biomass, solar thermal and fuel cells.   While some of the technologies on the lower end of the graph may not be viable for certain areas of the country, certainly they represent possible growth areas in the future.  We’ve seen that combined heat and power (CHP) is certainly on the rise in net metering policies; just this month New York authorized CHP as an eligible technology, following on the heels of several other states this year alone. <em>[Continued in newsletter]</em></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><strong>State News in Detail:</strong></strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Northeast States</strong></p>
<p>Connecticut IOU’s note intention to suspend insurance requirements for small generators</p>
<p>Massachusetts DPU adopts model NM/IC tariffs</p>
<p>New York includes legislation to allow fuel cells and Micro-CHP to net meter; PSC releases funds for RPS program</p>
<p>Rhode Island’s National Grid submits revised QF tariff for consideration</p>
<p><strong>Mid-Atlantic States</strong></p>
<p>D.C. neighborhood’s Solar Cooperative begins PV installations</p>
<p>Pennsylvania PUC gives utility the green light to purchase solar credits for AEPS compliance</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Midwestern States</strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p>Michigan PSC requests comments on utility plans to utilize dispatchable, customer-owned DG</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Southern States</strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p>Georgia PSC modifies terms of solar purchase tariff</p>
<p>Austin, Texas investigates a sharp increase in solar commitment</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Western States</strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p>Arizona ACC continues examination of third-party regulation; ACC renewable energy ratemaking authority held up in court decision</p>
<p>California continues feed-in tariff discussion</p>
<p>Colorado PUC issues emergency rules that pertain to net metering; Xcel Energy requests that third-parties be eligible for SolarRewards Program incentives</p>
<p>Oregon PUC directed to establish pilot production incentives for solar energy producers</p>
<p>Utah PSC issues proposed new rules for interconnection</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Miscellaneous News </strong></p>
<p>Maine signs agreement with FERC to speed development of tidal energy resources</p>
<p>China launches differentiated wind energy tariffs</p>
<p>Research Shows Distributed Solar Energy Market to Reach $55 Billion by 2012</p>
<p>Solar Decathalon competition adds a net metering component in 2009</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Conferences and Events</strong></p>
<hr />
<dl>
<dt>Files:</dt>
<dd><a href="http://irecusa.org/uploads/media/September_2009_Connecting_to_the_Grid.doc">September_2009_Connecting_to_the_Grid.doc</a></dd>
<dd><a href="http://irecusa.org/uploads/media/September_2009_Connecting_to_the_Grid.pdf">September_2009_Connecting_to_the_Grid.pdf</a></dd>
</dl>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irecusa.org/2009/09/september-2009-irec-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>August 2009 IREC &quot;Connecting to the Grid&quot; Newsletter</title>
		<link>http://irecusa.org/2009/08/august-2009-irec-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/</link>
		<comments>http://irecusa.org/2009/08/august-2009-irec-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Connecting to the Grid Newsletter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irecusa.org/2009/08/august-2009-irec-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor:  Laurel Varnado
NC Solar Center, NC State University
HOW TO SUBSCRIBE
The Connecting to the Grid newsletter is published electronically every month by the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) and the North Carolina Solar Center at North Carolina State University.  This is a free publication.  Click here to subscribe.
 
FORMAT 
While customer-sited net metering and interconnection are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: small;">Editor:  Laurel Varnado</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">NC Solar Center, NC State University</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small;">HOW TO SUBSCRIBE</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">The Connecting to the Grid newsletter is published electronically every month by the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) and the North Carolina Solar Center at North Carolina State University.  This is a free publication.  Click </span><a href="http://visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101486440047" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101486440047&amp;referer=');"><span style="font-size: small;">here</span></a><span style="font-size: small;"> to subscribe.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small;">FORMAT </span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">While customer-sited net metering and interconnection are primarily state issues, they are also becoming important on a regional basis.    This newsletter has been designed to capture any subtle, emerging regional trends.  The state news is presented in geographic categories, primarily because the standard NERC and/or RTO/ISO regions do not always align with state boundaries. Please direct comments and questions about the newsletter to Laurel Varnado at </span><a href="mailto:lavarnad@ncsu.edu"><span style="font-size: small;">lavarnad@ncsu.edu</span></a><span style="font-size: small;">.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><strong><em>Note:  Scroll to the bottom of this page to download complete newsletter</em></strong>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large;"><strong>WHAT&#8217;S NEW AS OF August 2009? </strong></span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: medium;">Note from the Editor &#8211; How Does FERC Influence State Policy?</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Certainly changes in Federal policy (like PURPA and EPAct 2005) directly impact states’ abilities to enact, adopt or modify net metering and interconnection policies.  There are a number of other direct and indirect mechanisms through which the federal government can influence state policies though, without the need for legislative authority. What are some of these methods and how do they work given the divide between state and federal jurisdiction over net metering and interconnection matters?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is one of the more significant voices states hear when setting energy policies.  FERC, an independent U.S. government agency that regulates the interstate transmission of electricity, natural gas, and oil, has three overarching goals: 1) Promote the Development of a Strong Energy Infrastructure, 2) Support Competitive Markets, and 3) Prevent Market Manipulation in the energy industries.  The Federal Power Act, Section 824 (b), gives FERC jurisdiction in cases of wholesale or interstate commerce power transactions, though it has generally been interpreted to mean that FERC has jurisdiction when a system is interconnected to transmission lines that are capable of transmitting power across state lines. If the transaction is retail or solely intrastate in nature, it is within state jurisdiction.  Given this divide, what different hats can FERC wear to influence state policy? <em>[Continued in Newsletter]</em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-size: small;"><strong><span style="font-size: medium;">State News in Detail:</span></strong></span></span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small;">Northeast States</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Maine legislature increases RPS credit for community-owned systems</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Massachusetts DPU holds technical hearing on net metering and interconnection model tariffs</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">New Hampshire PUC formally adopts net metering rule</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">New York’s ConEd to deploy AMI pilot in NYC</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Rhode Island Governor signs legislation that broadens scope of net metering</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Vermont PSB continues work on Feed-in Tariff rulemaking</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small;">Mid-Atlantic States</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">New Jersey approves SREC purchases</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small;">Midwestern States</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Illinois ICC extends deadline for large generator interconnection docket finalization</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Kansas KCC begins net metering investigation, issues order on EISA 2007 smart grid consideration</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Michigan’s Consumers Energy begins experimental feed-in tariff</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Minnesota PUC invites comments on wind turbine setbacks</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">South Dakota PUC is accepting comments on Interconnection, via the Small Renewable Energy Initiative</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Wisconsin PSC continues discussion of Advanced Renewable Tariff</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><strong>Southern States</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Florida’s LCEC cooperative offers net metering for systems up to one MW</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Georgia PSC approves expansion of Georgia Power’s solar purchase program for customers</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">South Carolina PSC approves net metering settlement</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small;">Western States</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Colorado PUC files supplemental NOPR for interconnection docket</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Nevada PUC opens several renewables dockets</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">New Mexico Governor lobbies against PPA regulation</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Oregon Governor vetoes renewable energy bills</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small;">Other States</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Hawaii allows preferential rates for agriculturally produced power</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: medium;">Miscellaneous News</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Feed-in Tariff planned for UK?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Xcel Proposes then withdraws net metering charge</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">DOE announces nearly $12M for solar grid integration development</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><strong>Conferences and Events</strong></span></p>
<hr />
<div>
<dl>
<dt>Files:</dt>
<dd><img src="http://irecusa.org/typo3/sysext/cms/tslib/media/fileicons/doc.gif" border="0" alt="" width="18" height="16" /><a href="http://irecusa.org/uploads/media/August_2009_Connecting_to_the_Grid.doc">August_2009_Connecting_to_the_Grid.doc</a></dd>
<dd><img src="http://irecusa.org/typo3/sysext/cms/tslib/media/fileicons/pdf.gif" border="0" alt="" width="18" height="16" /><a href="http://irecusa.org/uploads/media/August_2009_Connecting_to_the_Grid.pdf">August_2009_Connecting_to_the_Grid.pdf</a></dd>
</dl>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irecusa.org/2009/08/august-2009-irec-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>July 2009 IREC &quot;Connecting to the Grid&quot; Newsletter</title>
		<link>http://irecusa.org/2009/07/july-2009-irec-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/</link>
		<comments>http://irecusa.org/2009/07/july-2009-irec-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Connecting to the Grid Newsletter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irecusa.org/2009/07/july-2009-irec-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor:  Laurel Varnado
NC Solar Center, NC State University
HOW TO SUBSCRIBE
The Connecting to the Grid newsletter is published electronically every month by the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) and the North Carolina Solar Center at North Carolina State University.  This is a free publication.  Click here to subscribe.
 
FORMAT 
While customer-sited net metering and interconnection are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: small;">Editor:  Laurel Varnado</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">NC Solar Center, NC State University</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small;">HOW TO SUBSCRIBE</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">The Connecting to the Grid newsletter is published electronically every month by the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) and the North Carolina Solar Center at North Carolina State University.  This is a free publication.  Click </span><a href="http://visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101486440047" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101486440047&amp;referer=');"><span style="font-size: small;">here</span></a><span style="font-size: small;"> to subscribe.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small;">FORMAT </span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">While customer-sited net metering and interconnection are primarily state issues, they are also becoming important on a regional basis.    This newsletter has been designed to capture any subtle, emerging regional trends.  The state news is presented in geographic categories, primarily because the standard NERC and/or RTO/ISO regions do not always align with state boundaries. Please direct comments and questions about the newsletter to Laurel Varnado at </span><a href="mailto:lavarnad@ncsu.edu"><span style="font-size: small;">lavarnad@ncsu.edu</span></a><span style="font-size: small;">.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><strong><em>Note:  Scroll to the bottom of this page to download complete newsletter</em></strong>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: large;"><strong>WHAT&#8217;S NEW AS OF JULY 2009? </strong></span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: medium;">Note from the Editor &#8211; Indefinite rollover, the great equalizer</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">As summer turns up the sun’s rays for PV systems across the country, let us briefly consider how a net metering policy’s provision for Net Excess Generation (NEG) rollover can affect the financial outlook for different types of DG systems. If a customer-generator sizes a system to meet average annual onsite energy consumption, ideally the customer would benefit most from an annualized period that starts before the peak production season of the generation unit so that the excess energy carries forward to the less productive months ahead. Because the seasonal output of solar-energy systems is much different than that of wind-energy or other systems, it is next to impossible to define an annual period that would benefit all customer-generators equally. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Indefinite rollover is therefore considered a best practice, from IREC’s perspective.  With the addition of Delaware this month, by our count, 11 states  and the District of Columbia allow indefinite rollover of NEG, with no monthly or annual settlement for net metering credits. The next best scenario, as in the case of New Jersey, is to allow customers to choose their own annual period so that they can optimize the use of any excess generation. Arizona requires a calendar year true-up at the end of December, and other states, such as Pennsylvania and North Carolina, set an annualized period beginning in June and ending in May of the following year. Some states do not allow retail credits to roll over at all; New Mexico currently requires monthly settlement at avoided cost (though this may be changing through a PRC rulemaking), and Alaska’s proposed rules also stipulate monthly settlement. The following is a brief look at how a few generation types differ regarding peak performance. </span></p>
<p><strong>Solar</strong> –At first glance, it would seem that an annualized period beginning in the late spring would best suit PV systems, due to summer’s longer days.  NEG credits can be a complex issue though, even if the annual period starts at the beginning of the summer. Here in North Carolina, for example, if you look at the PV Watts calculation for peak solar production, you’ll find that peak production months (using the optimal panel tilt for the latitude) occur in March, April and May.  This time period also correspond to some of residents’ lowest energy consumption months, in part, because we don’t need air conditioning yet. North Carolina’s net metering policy, however, requires that all NEG be surrendered to the utility on May 31, with no compensation for the customer.  This annualized period would therefore probably be the least optimal situation for PV system owners in that they may not carry forward all their accrued NEG throughout the high-energy cost summer months.   <em>[Continued in Newsletter] </em></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><strong><span style="font-size: medium;">State News in Detail:</span></strong></span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small;">Northeast States</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Massachusetts DPU issues net metering order</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">New Hampshire PUC submits proposed net metering rule to JLCAR for approval</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">New York DPS approves net metering tariffs</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Vermont PSB opens dockets for Feed-in Tariff implementation</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small;">Mid-Atlantic States</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Delaware bills allow for indefinite NEG rollover, increase aggregate cap and provide net metering-like credits for grid integrated vehicles</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">New Jersey resumes discussion on Community Renewables Program</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">West Virginia Legislature requires PSC to consider net metering advancements</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small;">Midwestern States</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Michigan PSC authorizes munis’ renewable energy plans</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Missouri PSC issues order on liability insurance requirements</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">South Dakota PUC requests comments on Small Generator Interconnection forms</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><strong>Southern States</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">South Carolina: Net metering settlement signed by Office of Regulatory Staff and utilities</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Tennessee signs ‘Clean Energy’ bill</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small;">Western States</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Arizona ACC approves APS’s net metering tariff</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">California PUC approves SCE’s plan for 500 MW of distributed solar installations</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Idaho PUC asked to rule on ownership of RECs under PURPA contracts</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><strong><span style="font-size: medium;">Miscellaneous News</span></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">East Africa: Region&#8217;s States Pursue Joint Power Supply Plan</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">DOE Approves $508M for 16 States&#8217; Spending</span></p>
<p>‘Fast-Track’ Initiatives for Solar Energy Development on Western Lands Announced</p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><span style="font-size: medium;">Conferences and Events</span></strong></span></p>
<hr />
<div>
<dl>
<dt>Files:</dt>
<dd><img src="http://irecusa.org/typo3/sysext/cms/tslib/media/fileicons/doc.gif" border="0" alt="" width="18" height="16" /><a href="http://irecusa.org/uploads/media/July_2009_Connecting_to_the_Grid.doc">July_2009_Connecting_to_the_Grid.doc</a></dd>
<dd><img src="http://irecusa.org/typo3/sysext/cms/tslib/media/fileicons/pdf.gif" border="0" alt="" width="18" height="16" /><a href="http://irecusa.org/uploads/media/July_2009_Connecting_to_the_Grid.pdf">July_2009_Connecting_to_the_Grid.pdf</a></dd>
</dl>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irecusa.org/2009/07/july-2009-irec-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>June 2009 IREC &quot;Connecting to the Grid&quot; Newsletter</title>
		<link>http://irecusa.org/2009/06/june-2009-irec-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/</link>
		<comments>http://irecusa.org/2009/06/june-2009-irec-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Connecting to the Grid Newsletter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irecusa.org/2009/06/june-2009-irec-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor:  Laurel Varnado
NC Solar Center, NC State University
HOW TO SUBSCRIBE
The Connecting to the Grid newsletter is published electronically every month by the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) and the North Carolina Solar Center at North Carolina State University.  This is a free publication.  Click here to subscribe.
FORMAT 
While customer-sited net metering and interconnection are primarily [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Editor:  Laurel Varnado</p>
<p>NC Solar Center, NC State University</p>
<p><strong>HOW TO SUBSCRIBE</strong></p>
<p>The Connecting to the Grid newsletter is published electronically every month by the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) and the North Carolina Solar Center at North Carolina State University.  This is a free publication.  Click <a href="http://visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101486440047" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101486440047&amp;referer=');">here</a> to subscribe.</p>
<p><strong>FORMAT </strong></p>
<p>While customer-sited net metering and interconnection are primarily state issues, they are also becoming important on a regional basis.    This newsletter has been designed to capture any subtle, emerging regional trends.  The state news is presented in geographic categories, primarily because the standard NERC and/or RTO/ISO regions do not always align with state boundaries. Please direct comments and questions about the newsletter to Laurel Varnado at <a href="mailto:lavarnad@ncsu.edu">lavarnad@ncsu.edu</a>.</p>
<p><strong><em>Note:  Scroll to the bottom of this page to download complete newsletter</em></strong>.</p>
<p><strong>WHAT&#8217;S NEW AS OF JUNE 2009? </strong></p>
<p><strong>Note from the Editor &#8211; FAQ&#8217;s on REC Ownership</strong></p>
<p>The topic of Renewable Energy Credits (RECs), a.k.a Green Tags or Tradable Renewable Energy Certificates, has spurred some serious dialogue in the net metering policy sphere over the past few months.  In short, REC&#8217;s enable the environmental (non-power) attributes of renewable generation to be unbundled or considered separately from the associated energy commodity. Below I have compiled a list of questions frequently asked about RECs and provided some brief responses.</p>
<p><em>What constitutes a REC?</em> One REC is almost always equal to one MWh of renewable generation; beyond that however, the exact make-up and definition of a REC varies by state. There has been considerable debate over whether a REC is synonymous with, or at least includes, a carbon emission reduction or whether the carbon piece can be unbundled and sold separately from the REC. Most state statutes do not specify this in their definition of a REC, leaving the definition somewhat ambiguous such as ‘environmental attribute of renewable generation’.  Delaware and North Carolina specifically state that a REC does not include an emission reduction credit while several others (CO, NY, WA, AZ) declare that REC’s include all non-power attributes, including carbon emission reduction.</p>
<p><em>What’s the status with state net metering policies and REC ownership?</em> State net metering policies are fairly equally divided between addressing and ignoring REC ownership. Currently, 22 states have laws that permit net metering customers to keep all or a portion of RECs, though some have creative caveats for the treatment of those credits.  Over half of these 22 states confer outright ownership of all RECs to the customer-generator.  A few have provisions in which customers must surrender RECs for a certain number of years when accepting investor-owned utility incentive payments (the utility is essentially paying for those RECs upfront). Others have alternative arrangements that require the utility to pay the customer for RECs or delineate a method by which the customer and utility may share customer-sited RECs. [See newsletter for complete article]</p>
<p><strong>Legislative Round-up</strong></p>
<p>The legislative season is winding down in most states and we’ve seen quite a few updates to net metering and interconnection policies as a result. So far we’ve seen interesting developments with some common themes of allowing third-party participation in net metering and expanding net metering to larger sizes and more types of renewable generation. We’ve also seen more interest in allowing shared net metering systems. Here are the highlights from the legislative season:</p>
<p><strong>Northeast:</strong> Recently Maine enacted LD 336, which allows shared ownership of net billing facilities up to 660 kW and includes Micro CHP as an eligible facility.  Vermont made the legislative news this month by passing an energy bill (H.B. 446) that requires retail utilities to offer a Feed-in Tariff for renewable generators.</p>
<p><strong>Mid-Atlantic:</strong> In May, Maryland enacted HB 1057 and SB 981, which clarify the definition of a net metering customer to include those working with third-party contractors, and add micro CHP as an eligible system type. Last month Virginia enacted HB 2155 which included provisions to allow utilities to approve higher system caps, allows customers on TOU tariffs to participate in net metering and specified customer ownership of RECs. Virginia also enacted H.B. 2171, which specifies that a farm, or aggregation of farms, operating a waste-to-energy facility may not be considered a public utility. Now that the SCC has adopted comprehensive interconnection rules, Virginia is really stepping up as a key policy player in the region.</p>
<p><strong>Midwest:</strong> Last month Kansas and Nebraska made headlines by enacting state-wide net metering laws. The addition of these two states to the <a href="http://www.dsireusa.org/documents/SummaryMaps/Net_Metering_map.ppt" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dsireusa.org/documents/SummaryMaps/Net_Metering_map.ppt?referer=');">net metering map</a> bring the nation’s total up to 42 state-wide net metering polices (plus a few other states in which utilities voluntarily offer programs). Minnesota also enacted a comprehensive energy bill that authorizes a community-based wind project and requires utilities to develop standard offer contracts for projects under 5 MW, among other things.</p>
<p><strong>Southern:</strong> We have seen a whole slew of NM/IC bills try and then fail at state legislatures around the South.  There has been some advancement; however, through other renewable energy policies like tax credits.  Refer to <a href="http://www.dsireusa.org/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dsireusa.org/?referer=');">DSIRE</a> for more information on these.</p>
<p><strong>Western:</strong> In April, Colorado enacted SB 51 which codifies that third-party developers are not public utilities so long as the systems they own supply no more than 120% of the customer’s average annual consumption and allows a customer to make a one-time election to have indefinite rollover of excess generation instead of an annual true-up at avoided cost rates. Nevada enacted a bill (AB 186) that specified third-party-owned systems are eligible for net metering.  This was ruled upon last year through a Nevada PUC ruling but this legislative action strengthens the rule considerably.</p>
<p><strong>Other:</strong> Hawaiian Governor Linda Lingle has so far signed legislation (HB 1270) which removes a statutory cap on rates paid to independent renewable energy power producers. On a related note, she has also signed legislation (<a href="http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2009/bills/SB1260_HD1_.pdf" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2009/bills/SB1260_HD1_.pdf?referer=');">SB 1260</a>) that sews up a loophole that existed in the state’s air pollution laws, which allowed large polluters — such as power plants and refineries — to avoid paying per-ton penalties on excessive emissions.</p>
<p><strong>State News in Detail:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Northern</strong></p>
<p>Maine – Governor signs net metering bill, authorizing shared system net metering</p>
<p>New Hampshire – PUC schedules public hearing on proposed Net Metering rules</p>
<p>New York – DPS issues favorable order regarding standby charges for renewable generation</p>
<p>Vermont – Energy bill enacted, creating a Feed-in Tariff; Proposed net metering rules become effective</p>
<p><strong>Mid-Atlantic</strong></p>
<p>Maryland – Governor signs bill to expand definition of customer-generator for NM</p>
<p>Virginia – SCC adopts comprehensive interconnection procedures</p>
<p>West Virginia – Governor rejects net metering legislation</p>
<p><strong>Midwestern</strong></p>
<p>Kansas – Governor signs net metering legislation</p>
<p>Minnesota – Governor signs energy bill</p>
<p>Nebraska – Net metering bill signed into law</p>
<p>South Dakota – PUC approves Small Generator Interconnection Rules for systems up to 10 MW</p>
<p><strong>Southern</strong></p>
<p>Georgia – PSC wins DOE award to study barriers to solar energy deployment</p>
<p>North Carolina – NCUC approves NM tariffs</p>
<p><strong>Western</strong></p>
<p>California – Report issued on FiT policy options</p>
<p>Nevada – Governor signs bill regarding 3rd party ownership of net metering</p>
<p>New Mexico – PRC opens docket to address NEG rollover for net metering</p>
<p>Washington – Community solar bill signed</p>
<p><strong>Other</strong></p>
<p>Hawaii – Governor signs bill to lift avoided-cost payment cap for certain renewable generation</p>
<p><strong>Miscellaneous News </strong></p>
<p>Xcel asks state PUC to rule on ownership of renewable energy credits</p>
<p>China eyes 20 % renewable energy by 2020</p>
<p>U.S. demand for residential solar rising in &#8216;09</p>
<p>Schools Line Up to Install Solar Panels</p>
<p><strong>Conferences and Events </strong></p>
<hr />
<dl>
<dt>Files:</dt>
<dd><a href="http://irecusa.org/uploads/media/June_2009_Connecting_to_the_Grid.pdf">June_2009_Connecting_to_the_Grid.pdf</a></dd>
<dd><a href="http://irecusa.org/uploads/media/June_2009_Connecting_to_the_Grid.doc">June_2009_Connecting_to_the_Grid.doc</a></dd>
</dl>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irecusa.org/2009/06/june-2009-irec-connecting-to-the-grid-newsletter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
